| |
BGonline.org Forums
Inconceivable!
Posted By: happyjuggler0 In Response To: Inconceivable! (Nack Ballard)
Date: Sunday, 25 July 2010, at 4:02 a.m.
Yikes!
For starters. I intend to change my play with 52 *again*. I suspect it will make me look a bit more like a donkey, at least amongst a certain group of players who over-emphasize 55 and under-emphasize the other 35 rolls, especially 64 . Maybe I'll pick up some extra equity (beyond what the bots claim) as a result anyways.
I'll also split with the 54 here, which is also what I'd have done anyway. 54 down just feels wrong, which is unscientific I know, but there it is.
Thanks for the response Nack, it is more than I deserve, but perhaps it is what Neil deserves. Your attention to factors I had not even considered is humbling.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.