[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Analysis

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 1:56 a.m.

In Response To: Analysis (Paul Weaver)

149


2O ' ' ' '5X2X2X ' ' '5O

1X ' ' '2O4O '2O ' ' '5X

65R-31P-61P-62 (D is best)163


149


2O ' ' ' '5X2X2X ' ' '5O

1X ' ' '2O4O '2O ' ' '5X

65R-31P-61P-63 (Z is best)163


Looks like I missed all the fun.

IMO, your original post gave away the answers (IMO). Running or bringing a spare into the 5pt look like normal-type plays, for which presumably you would have issued no "very-impressed" challenge. If one rejects the weak $ (13/4) play, that reasonably leaves only Z and D. The only remaining trick is assigning Z to one roll and D to the other, and I guessed correctly. Very nice analysis, btw.

Now that I've said that, you might randomize/reverse the QF next time, and to be honest I have no idea what I would have played over the board. In any case, it's a great position pair. You could even make it a trio by including 65R-31P-61P-64 (shown below), where (I assume) R is best.

149


2O ' ' ' '5X2X2X ' ' '5O

1X ' ' '2O4O '2O ' ' '5X

65R-31P-61P-64 (R is best)163


Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.