BGonline.org Forums

64S-62H-43, 63S-63H-43, 62S-64H-52

Posted By: Sam Pottle
Date: Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 5:24 a.m.

In Response To: 64S-62H-43, 63S-63H-43, 62S-64H-52 (Paul Weaver)

I'm just a simple fellow; I would hit in all three positions.

QF strongly suggests that this is wrong.

Messages In This Thread

• 64S-62H-43, 63S-63H-43, 62S-64H-52
  Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 12:06 a.m.
  • 64S-62H-43, 63S-63H-43, 62S-64H-52
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 5:21 a.m.
  • 64S-62H-43, 63S-63H-43, 62S-64H-52
    Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 5:24 a.m.
  • Rollouts and Comments
    Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 5:38 p.m.
    • Rollouts and Comments
      David -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 6:34 p.m.
      • Rollouts and Comments
        David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 7:22 p.m.
        • Giving Seminars
          Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 7:28 p.m.
          • Giving Seminars
            neilkaz -- Wednesday, 28 July 2010, at 2:56 a.m.
      • Strongly Recommeding the Tournament in Madison over Labor Day
        Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 7:22 p.m.
        • Strongly Recommeding the Tournament in Madison over Labor Day
          Bill -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 7:44 p.m.
    • Rollouts and Comments
      Martin -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 7:51 p.m.
      • Rollouts and Comments
        Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 27 July 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
    • Secondary back checker principle
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 28 July 2010, at 3:59 a.m.