[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

question for Nack

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 1 August 2010, at 10:19 p.m.

In Response To: question for Nack (David Rockwell)


2O ' ' ' '5X '3X ' ' '5O

' ' '1X1X5O '3O ' ' '5X

43U-62


Am I correct that you are interested in H and h and are not interested in X?

Actually, I am interested in X (hit-and-split, 24/18 6/4*), though I'm not sure it's worth expending XG 4-ply CPU on at this point.

The rollouts I have are: Snowie [H h41 X41] 5k and [H h50 X61] 5k (just found that one), GnuBG [H h10] 15k and XG 3-ply [H h33] 31k -- no X yet in the latter two rollouts.

Given this second reason (the first one being suspected corruption), it probably makes best sense to do a 5k Gnu reroll (of H, h and X) first and go from there.

[In case anyone wonders, h (hit) and N (Near, used in my previous post) are both valid ways to nactate the 13/7 6/4* play.]

There are a couple/few other positions where IMO a third candidate play is close enough to include in a 4-ply RO, but rather than complicate the list I was figuring Neil/whoever might notice it beforehand or it can be added to the RO afterwards.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.