[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

32S-54H-42P-F-41, and variants

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 19 August 2010, at 1:29 p.m.

In Response To: 32S-54H-42P-F-41, and variants (Nack Ballard)

I think Nack's 63 example effectively questions my "efficiency" argument. It supports my "immediate impact" argument by creating three more dancing numbers and preventing entering with a five.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.