BGonline.org Forums

41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Friday, 20 August 2010, at 10:50 p.m.

In Response To: 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started (Nack Ballard)

There is a reply where the 24/16* with 22 is correct and I think it is useful to think why.

Messages In This Thread

• 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
  neilkaz -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 7:40 p.m.
  • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
    Paul Weaver -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 8:28 p.m.
    • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
      Leonardo Jerkovic -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 9:16 p.m.
      • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
        Stick -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 11:35 p.m.
  • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
    Nack Ballard -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 10:01 p.m.
    • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
      Bob Koca -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 10:50 p.m.
      • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 11:30 p.m.
        • Re: 64S-44
          neilkaz -- Friday, 20 August 2010, at 11:48 p.m.
          • Re: 64S-44
            Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 21 August 2010, at 12:59 a.m.
    • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
      Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 12 April 2012, at 7:42 a.m.
      • 41S-22 XG 4 ply RO started
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 12 April 2012, at 4:00 p.m.
      • Did I ever post my RO result? *NM*
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 12 April 2012, at 5:02 p.m.
        • yes - here is the link
          David Rockwell -- Thursday, 12 April 2012, at 5:18 p.m.