BGonline.org Forums
Move sequence
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 2:01 p.m.
In Response To: 21S-42P-65@-65, and variant (Nack Ballard)
In fact 21S-42P-65@-65 was the actual move sequence. I was in a hurry when I posted and typed the sequence (incorrectly) from memory.
Messages In This Thread
- 62S-42P-51@-65?
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 1:00 a.m.
- 62S-42P-51@-65?
neilkaz -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 1:31 a.m.
- Look at the Resulting Distributions
Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 3:38 a.m.
- 21S-42P-65@-65, and variant
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 12:06 p.m.
- Nactation question: 51>
Petter Bengtsson -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 12:20 p.m.
- Move sequence
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 2:01 p.m.
- Rollout: 21S-42P-65@-65?
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 27 August 2010, at 12:04 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.