BGonline.org Forums

New Nabracs syntax?

Posted By: Petter Bengtsson
Date: Monday, 30 August 2010, at 1:28 a.m.

In Response To: 63R-11 / 4-ply (Nack Ballard)

You seem to have changed/simplified the Nabracs syntax.

How do you write this using the new syntax?

63S-32 [S=W Z3 U5 $9 H18] 46k 25kU 10k$ 5kH

This doesn't look good...

63S-32 [S=W Z3 U5 $9 H18] 46**25105

I guess there should be some separator character between 25, 10 and 5 to make it more readable.

Messages In This Thread

• 63R-11 / 4-ply
  David Rockwell -- Sunday, 29 August 2010, at 3:28 p.m.
  • 43U-62 next
    David Rockwell -- Sunday, 29 August 2010, at 3:42 p.m.
    • 43U-62 next
      Bob Koca -- Sunday, 29 August 2010, at 4:23 p.m.
  • 63R-11 / 4-ply
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 30 August 2010, at 12:41 a.m.
    • New Nabracs syntax?
      Petter Bengtsson -- Monday, 30 August 2010, at 1:28 a.m.
      • New Nabracs syntax
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 30 August 2010, at 3:41 a.m.
    • 63R-11 — Gammon Save — GnuBg Rollout & Nactation Update
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 1 August 2012, at 10:43 p.m.
      • 63R-11 — Gammon Save — GnuBg Rollout & Nactation Update
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 5 August 2012, at 3:41 a.m.
  • 63R-11 / 4-ply
    neilkaz -- Monday, 30 August 2010, at 3:15 p.m.
    • 63R-11 / 4-ply - analysis
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 30 August 2010, at 4:05 p.m.