The top 3 moves of both positions result in the same posisions.
For instance 14/8 10/7 in position 1 results in the same position as 13/8 10/7 in position 2.
So I would expect that XG's analysis has the same ordering for the top 1,2 and 3 after position 1 and 2. However it doesn't:
If I give the positions after move 1,2 and 3 in position 1's analysis the names A, B and C, then in position 2's analysis they are ordered as C, A, B !
Also XG thinks there's a reasonable amount of equity between them.
Now that I'm posting this I notice that in position 1 the slotting move was not analysed at XG Roller + level, but in position 2 it was.
Should I have put the search interval bigger to prevent this from happening?
| 1. | XG Roller+ | 14/8 10/7 | eq: +0,618 |
| Player: Opponent: | 80,90% (G:5,30% B:0,15%) 19,10% (G:0,72% B:0,00%) | |
|
| 2. | XG Roller+ | 14/5 | eq: +0,602 (-0,016) |
| Player: Opponent: | 80,11% (G:4,84% B:0,13%) 19,89% (G:0,76% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 3. | 3 ply | 14/8 6/3 | eq: +0,580 (-0,038) |
| Player: Opponent: | 78,98% (G:7,26% B:0,17%) 21,02% (G:3,26% B:0,02%) | |
|
| 4. | 3 ply | 14/11 10/4 | eq: +0,560 (-0,058) |
| Player: Opponent: | 78,01% (G:4,31% B:0,10%) 21,99% (G:1,22% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 5. | 3 ply | 10/4 6/3 | eq: +0,534 (-0,084) |
| Player: Opponent: | 76,71% (G:6,40% B:0,16%) 23,29% (G:3,63% B:0,02%) | |
|
| 1. | XG Roller+ | 10/5 6/3 | eq: +0,632 |
| Player: Opponent: | 81,60% (G:6,59% B:0,18%) 18,40% (G:3,05% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 2. | XG Roller+ | 13/8 10/7 | eq: +0,612 (-0,020) |
| Player: Opponent: | 80,58% (G:5,13% B:0,14%) 19,42% (G:0,79% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 3. | XG Roller+ | 13/5 | eq: +0,607 (-0,025) |
| Player: Opponent: | 80,36% (G:4,50% B:0,15%) 19,64% (G:0,89% B:0,01%) | |
|
| 4. | 3 ply | 13/8 6/3 | eq: +0,580 (-0,053) |
| Player: Opponent: | 78,98% (G:7,26% B:0,17%) 21,02% (G:3,26% B:0,02%) | |
|
| 5. | 3 ply | 10/7 6/1 | eq: +0,557 (-0,075) |
| Player: Opponent: | 77,84% (G:4,64% B:0,10%) 22,16% (G:1,30% B:0,01%) | |
|