BGonline.org Forums

41S-41K-52-32X-51

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 13 September 2010, at 1:56 p.m.

In Response To: 41S-41K-52>-32X-51 (Nack Ballard)

Nack wrote:

White's plays so far were both errors.

In this case, White was GNU 2-ply! What should she have played with the 21?

Messages In This Thread

• Four blots to choose from! (5th roll position)
  Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 12 September 2010, at 8:07 p.m.
  • Four blots to choose from! (5th roll position)
    John O'Hagan -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 4:26 a.m.
  • 41S-41K-52>-32X-51
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 5:36 a.m.
    • 41S-41K-52-32X-51
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 1:56 p.m.
      • 43Z-43, and 43Z-43K-52>-21
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 15 September 2010, at 9:51 p.m.
  • Four blots to choose from! (5th roll position)
    neilkaz -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 3:40 p.m.
  • Rollout: Four blots to choose from! (5th roll position)
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 11:18 p.m.
    • Rollout: Four blots to choose from! (5th roll position)
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 4:37 a.m.
    • XG RO
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 5:19 p.m.
      • Thanks, Neil! *NM*
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 9:47 p.m.