BGonline.org Forums

Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists

Posted By: Gregg Cattanach
Date: Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 1:20 p.m.

In Response To: Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists (Stick)

By adding 64 and 54 to the list of blotting numbers, the jeopardy with 3 on the 6 is more severe here than 'normal'.

Messages In This Thread

• The need to avoid double jeopardy rarely exists
  mochy -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 6:03 p.m.
  • Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists
    neilkaz -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 7:15 p.m.
    • Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists
      Stick -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 7:42 p.m.
      • Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists
        David Rockwell -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 8:30 p.m.
      • During today's session
        Stick -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 2:25 a.m.
        • During today's session
          Stick -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 2:33 a.m.
          • During today's session
            Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 2:52 p.m.
          • During today's session
            neilkaz -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 10:59 p.m.
        • During today's session
          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 2:49 p.m.
        • During today's session
          neilkaz -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 10:56 p.m.
      • Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 4:35 a.m.
      • Avoiding double jeopardy rarely exists
        Gregg Cattanach -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 1:20 p.m.
  • What does "double jeopardy" mean? *NM*
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
    • What does "double jeopardy" mean?
      Stick -- Monday, 13 September 2010, at 9:33 p.m.
      • What does "double jeopardy" mean?
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 September 2010, at 12:41 a.m.