BGonline.org Forums

RO

Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Monday, 4 October 2010, at 6:03 p.m.

In Response To: Another 65 play (John O'Hagan)

Got this one wrong. I PoH but that creates fewer extra g's than extra losses which isn't a good trade ATS with gammon values just slightly higher than the normal 1/2.

	is Player 2 score: 12 pip: 135 13 point match pip: 128 score: 8 is Player 1
XGID=--aB--DBBAA-bA--ccBea-----:1:-1:1:56:8:12:0:13:10
to play 56

1.	Rollout1	10/4 9/4	eq: +0.578
	Player: Opponent: 67.09% (G:20.65% B:0.32%) 32.91% (G:6.93% B:0.49%) Conf: ± 0.008 (+0.570...+0.586) Duration: 8 minutes 40 seconds
2.	Rollout1	8/2* 7/2	eq: +0.519 (-0.058)
	Player: Opponent: 61.48% (G:25.60% B:0.31%) 38.52% (G:7.87% B:0.56%) Conf: ± 0.008 (+0.511...+0.527) Duration: 9 minutes 44 seconds
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves and cube decisions: 3 ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross

Messages In This Thread

• Another 65 play
  John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 3 October 2010, at 5:51 p.m.
  • Another 65 play
    christian munk-christensen -- Sunday, 3 October 2010, at 6:02 p.m.
    • Another 65 play
      Stick -- Sunday, 3 October 2010, at 6:12 p.m.
  • Another 65 play
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 3 October 2010, at 7:37 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Monday, 4 October 2010, at 6:03 p.m.