| |
BGonline.org Forums
London Bookies make Sax an 9 to 5 favorite.
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: London Bookies make Sax an 9 to 5 favorite. (Barry Silliman)
Date: Wednesday, 6 October 2010, at 6:50 p.m.
Honestly, the nice error rates are rather meaningless. I thought it was one of the most boring matches I've played in some time. I thought that most of the decisions in the match for both players were obvious. There were no complicated games and very few tough decisions. I actually slightly outplayed Steve on checkers, but got dinged very big on cube decisions in one game - first a 0.096 error taking his 4-cube down 0-8(15) in the following position. With 6 checkers off to Steve's 2, and the 6 point open, I was figuring I had perhaps 18% winning chances. But I was apparently way off as XG gives me not quite 13%.
is Player 2
score: 8
pip: 40![]()
15 point match pip: 47
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-D--BB--------------ccbbcA:1:-1:-1:00:0:8:0:15:10 on roll, cube action?
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
Then failing to recube to 8 later in the same game while being a dog. For example, the .317 cube error here:
is Player 2
score: 8
pip: 1315 point match ![]()
pip: 11
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-D-AA---------------aaa-a-:2:1:1:00:0:8:0:15:10 on roll, cube action?
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
And finally the 0.242 error here winning only 33% of the time:
is Player 2
score: 8
pip: 515 point match ![]()
pip: 4
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-D-------------------a--a-:2:1:1:00:0:8:0:15:10 on roll, cube action?
eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21
OTB, I thought about all of these cube decisions. I just never considered the 1 point of overage to be that much of a consideration, figuring I could redouble as a slight underdog. But I obviously erred by not considering how hopeless it is to come back from -3,-15 (though I did that once in Monte Carlo). Clearly my doubling window opens very far below 50% here, and I have obvious market losers.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.