BGonline.org Forums

Opening 21 at 𣛫, etc.

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 17 October 2010, at 7:39 p.m.

In Response To: Opening 21 @ -3,-5 RO (Neil Robins)

Thanks for the rollout, Neil R. I transcribed your rollout as XG 3-ply though noted that you implemented 4-ply for the first two rolls of the game. I also see you've switched over to the R/K (Rockwell/Kazaross) MET.

For opening 21, let's compare like-score rollouts for GnuBG (symbol /) and XG 3-ply (symbol <):

s[$ S2] /61
s[S $2] <67

𣈁 [S $5] /15
𣈁 [S $13] <20 (both G11 MET)

I'm mentioning this because your XG rollout at 𣛫 is also [S $13]; if the same position and score are rolled on GnuBG, it will yield a somewhat narrower margin, perhaps close to [S $5]. GnuBG's rollout results are consistently slot-happier; it's nice to have XG for comparison.

Here are some opening 21 results at a couple other less standard scores, on XG 4-ply (RK MET):

𣇾 [S $8] ^28
𣈀 [S $20] ^15

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Opening 21 @ -3,-5 RO
  Neil Robins -- Sunday, 17 October 2010, at 1:05 p.m.
  • Opening 21 at 𣛫, etc.
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 17 October 2010, at 7:39 p.m.
    • Opening 21 at 𣛫, etc.
      Stick -- Monday, 18 October 2010, at 9:28 p.m.
    • Opening 21 at 𣛫, etc.
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 18 October 2010, at 9:32 p.m.
      • Opening 21 at 𣛫, etc.
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 19 October 2010, at 3:18 a.m.