| |
BGonline.org Forums
63R-54 vs 51S-62R-52 (and 51S-63R-52)
Posted By: Maik Stiebler In Response To: 63R-54 vs 51S-62R-52 (and 51S-63R-52) (Nack Ballard)
Date: Sunday, 24 October 2010, at 10:49 p.m.
Thanks, Nack and David, for the great explanations. What was I thinking, though? First the S/R confusion (sorry about that), then I should have known that it's Z instead of S, and I totally failed to even notice the duplication factor, even during half an hour of post-mortem analysis. At least I managed to post one of those nifty side-by-side position diagrams.
XGR+ dinged me for 0.055 for X. After reading your comments and preliminary quick rollouts, I believe it will turn out to be a bit closer in my long 3-ply rollout.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.