BGonline.org Forums

How about 8/1* ?

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Monday, 1 November 2010, at 1:34 a.m.

In Response To: How about 8/1* ? (Paul Weaver)

There is certainly a valid idea behind 8-1*. I'd like to see it in the rollout too. The problem is obviously that you hit from the wrong point and don't get to split the back checkers.

Messages In This Thread

• 63S-43 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:36 a.m.
  • How about 8/1* ?
    Paul Weaver -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:50 a.m.
    • And 8/4 13/10?
      Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:55 a.m.
      • And 8/4 13/10?
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 4:21 a.m.
        • And 8/4 13/10?
          Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 5:17 a.m.
          • And 8/4 13/10?
            Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 9:30 a.m.
            • And 8/4 13/10?
              Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 10:56 a.m.
              • And 8/4 13/10?
                Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:48 p.m.
                • And 8/4 13/10?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 2:27 p.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 1:34 a.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 4:13 a.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      neilkaz -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 6:16 a.m.
  • 63S-43, data
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 2:19 a.m.