BGonline.org Forums

And 8/4 13/10?

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Monday, 1 November 2010, at 10:56 a.m.

In Response To: And 8/4 13/10? (Nack Ballard)

OK, let me check when back in Europe (and after unpacking some books that are still in boxes).

Thinking again, I believe that among others it was in Robertie's Reno book, first match (against Senk I believe).

If I remember right, you opened 62 (not 63, sorry), Robertie discuss Barclay Cooke, a long term proposition he played (split vs 13/5), and mentioned that after the split, the opener has a significant edge (a bit of an exaggeration). Then Senk rolled 43, played the cross-over slot, and Robertie discussed how effective the split was against a non-hitting number.

Apologies to all involved if I remembered wrongly!

Messages In This Thread

• 63S-43 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:36 a.m.
  • How about 8/1* ?
    Paul Weaver -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:50 a.m.
    • And 8/4 13/10?
      Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:55 a.m.
      • And 8/4 13/10?
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 4:21 a.m.
        • And 8/4 13/10?
          Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 5:17 a.m.
          • And 8/4 13/10?
            Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 9:30 a.m.
            • And 8/4 13/10?
              Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 10:56 a.m.
              • And 8/4 13/10?
                Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 12:48 p.m.
                • And 8/4 13/10?
                  Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 2:27 p.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 1:34 a.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 4:13 a.m.
    • How about 8/1* ?
      neilkaz -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 6:16 a.m.
  • 63S-43, data
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 1 November 2010, at 2:19 a.m.