| |
BGonline.org Forums
43Z-32, question for Neilkaz
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: 43Z-32, question for Neilkaz (christian munk-christensen)
Date: Sunday, 21 November 2010, at 6:21 p.m.
CMC asks,
"Will XG2 be stronger than XG?
Will you redo the Depreli studies to test it?
If it turns out to be stronger, I guess we can start over with all the opening rollouts. :-)"
Neil replies,
Please respect that I am working under a NDA so I won't say very much yet. But to address your questions, although somewhat in a sideways manner.
1) Xavier and I have earlier stated here that we both are extremely pleased with the progress made with XG2. So..the answer is YES.
2) We do something somewhat similar.
3) Some people may wish to again do 4 ply response RO's. For curiosity's sake I will likely do XGR+ RO's of a couple of the close opening plays but that will take this supercomp about a month for each position. I do not expect to be doing XGR+ RO's of responses nor will I tie up all 3 of my computers doing opening-type RO's since I want at least one free to do RO's to enhance my understanding of other important aspects of the game, and also to study my own play and to practice against.
.. neilkaz ..
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.