BGonline.org Forums

65-55-24-41,51,61

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:59 p.m.

In Response To: 65-55-24-41,51,61 (Matt Cohn-Geier)

O.K., I can see that hitting is more attractive with 61 than in the other two cases. It allows you to hit and split (getting ready to pick up the second checker) without stripping the 6pt. Still, with only 8 checkers in the zone, OTB I would have played the prosaic 13/7 8/7.

Messages In This Thread

• 65-55-24-41,51,61
  rew -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 1:44 p.m.
  • 65-55-24-41,51,61
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:51 p.m.
  • 65-55-24-41,51,61
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:54 p.m.
    • 65-55-24-41,51,61
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:59 p.m.
      • 65-55-24-41,51,61
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 4:12 p.m.
    • 65-55-24-41,51,61
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:24 p.m.
  • 65R-55A-42Z: 41/51/61
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 9:00 p.m.
  • XG eval
    rew -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:12 p.m.