BGonline.org Forums

65-55-24-41,51,61

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:24 p.m.

In Response To: 65-55-24-41,51,61 (Matt Cohn-Geier)

We agree and especially for the 61 play. I do expect hitting to be close with the 41 but it seems too loose and in comparison to hit/split with 61 after 61 you have one less blot and that blot is safe on the 6 pt in a good place. I doubt that hitting with 51 is correct since you don't split.

Messages In This Thread

• 65-55-24-41,51,61
  rew -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 1:44 p.m.
  • 65-55-24-41,51,61
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:51 p.m.
  • 65-55-24-41,51,61
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:54 p.m.
    • 65-55-24-41,51,61
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 3:59 p.m.
      • 65-55-24-41,51,61
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 4:12 p.m.
    • 65-55-24-41,51,61
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:24 p.m.
  • 65R-55A-42Z: 41/51/61
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 9:00 p.m.
  • XG eval
    rew -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:12 p.m.