BGonline.org Forums
32S-33B-32@-63?
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
In Response To: 32S-33B-32@-63? (6stones)
13/7 6/3 looks natural here and is my choice. I don't want to be hit, but it dupes some useful 3's on his side and isn't the end of the world to be hit. 13/10 6/2 is too weak and anything else looks quite wrong.
Messages In This Thread
- 32S-33B-32@-63?
6stones -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:53 a.m.
- 32S-33B-32@-63?
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:59 a.m.
- 32S-33B-32@-63?
Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 4:15 p.m.
- 32S-33B-32@-63?
Stick -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 5:31 p.m.
- 32S-33B-32@-63?
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
- 32S-33B-32S-63
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:43 p.m.
- 32S-33B-32S-63
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:18 a.m.
- Nactation of 32S-33B-32
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:19 a.m.
- RO
6stones -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 7:53 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.