BGonline.org Forums

32S-33B-32S-63

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:18 a.m.

In Response To: 32S-33B-32S-63 (Nack Ballard)

I didn't even consider o because I thought it would be dominated by A, but looking again I guess it's not so clear. It'll be interesting to see a rollout.

Messages In This Thread

• 32S-33B-32@-63?
  6stones -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:53 a.m.
  • 32S-33B-32@-63?
    Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:59 a.m.
  • 32S-33B-32@-63?
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 4:15 p.m.
  • 32S-33B-32@-63?
    Stick -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 5:31 p.m.
  • 32S-33B-32@-63?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
  • 32S-33B-32S-63
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 30 November 2010, at 11:43 p.m.
    • 32S-33B-32S-63
      Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:18 a.m.
  • Nactation of 32S-33B-32
    Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 12:19 a.m.
    • Nactation of 32S-33B-32
      Stick -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 5:07 a.m.
      • Nactation of 32S-33B-32
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 1 December 2010, at 6:23 a.m.
  • RO
    6stones -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 7:53 a.m.
    • should read:" if White has made five point", sorry *NM*
      6stones -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 8:07 a.m.