BGonline.org Forums

54S-63 and 43Z-64

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Friday, 3 December 2010, at 1:46 a.m.

In Response To: 54S-63 and 43Z-64 (David Rockwell)

I thought that I already took that factor into account. Please note the last sentence of my third paragraph:

"The presence of White's outfield blot might see X recouping some ground on H, but I'd be surprised if that causes it to close the expected gap at gammon go, a score that courts offensive near-side plays."

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 43Z-64^36 RO
  Claude Landry -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 3:21 p.m.
  • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
    Paul Weaver -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 3:52 p.m.
    • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
      David Rockwell -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 7:20 p.m.
      • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
        • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
          David Rockwell -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 10:51 p.m.
          • 32Z
            Nack Ballard -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 1:04 a.m.
    • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 10:18 p.m.
      • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
        David Rockwell -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 11:01 p.m.
        • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
          Stick -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 11:13 p.m.
          • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
            David Rockwell -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 11:44 p.m.
        • 54S-63 and 43Z-64
          Nack Ballard -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 12:50 a.m.
          • 54S-63 and 43Z-64
            David Rockwell -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 1:20 a.m.
            • 54S-63 and 43Z-64
              Nack Ballard -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 1:46 a.m.
    • 43Z-64 and 43S-64
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 10:36 p.m.
  • 43Z-64, data
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 8:52 p.m.