BGonline.org Forums
RO
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 3 December 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
In Response To: RO (John O'Hagan)
It's interesting to me that you considered 24/22 10/4 the "obvious play." The play didn't look obvious to me, and if I had to pick one as "obvious" I would have picked the running play; escaping Black's budding prime/attack in order to distract him by threatening his blot when the race is close and we have a stronger board seems logical. Is there a "minor" modification of the position where anchoring is correct? Like changing the position of Black's outfield blot or changing the score slightly or slightly weakening Yellow's front position?
Messages In This Thread
- White to play 62
John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 7:03 p.m.
- White to play 62
ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 7:10 p.m.
- White to play 62
higonefive -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 8:21 p.m.
- White to play 62
Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 2 December 2010, at 11:33 p.m.
- White to play 62
Chuck Bower -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 12:13 a.m.
- White to play 62
KenB -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 1:59 a.m.
- White to play 62
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 6:00 a.m.
- White to play 62
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 6:59 a.m.
- White to play 62
neilkaz -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 4:18 p.m.
- RO
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 6:15 p.m.
- RO
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 7:16 p.m.
- RO
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 3 December 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.