BGonline.org Forums

Redoubling Decision at -7-3

Posted By: ah_clem
Date: Friday, 10 December 2010, at 1:07 p.m.

In Response To: Redoubling Decision at -7-3 (Paul Weaver)

It's a bit gammonish fro both sides, but not that gammonish. Clearly, if each side had a 50% chance of wining a gammmon white would have to double here. But it's hardly that much chance of gammons.

With a checker on the bar aginst a three point board and a couple of other blots about, I dont see how it's good enough. I'm not even seeing any market losers.

I'd hold this one. The take looks pretty clear.

Messages In This Thread

• Redoubling Decision at -7-3
  Paul Weaver -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 7:37 a.m.
  • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 7:49 a.m.
    • higher mathematic concepts
      garyo -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 4:00 p.m.
    • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
      Stanley E. Richards -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 10:33 p.m.
      • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
        Stick -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 10:54 p.m.
  • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
    ah_clem -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 1:07 p.m.
    • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
      neilkaz -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 8:20 p.m.
  • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
    Michael Nielsen -- Friday, 10 December 2010, at 2:30 p.m.
  • Redoubling Decision at -7-3
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 11 December 2010, at 12:58 a.m.
  • Rollout Result Posted
    Paul Weaver -- Saturday, 11 December 2010, at 7:40 p.m.
    • Rollout Result Posted
      Stanley E. Richards -- Sunday, 12 December 2010, at 9:09 p.m.