BGonline.org Forums

42 for White

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 6:10 a.m.

In Response To: 42 for White (John O'Hagan)

I'd play 24/18* here, which seems to do more than making the 4 and giving opp a free roll to improve.

Messages In This Thread

• 42 for White
  John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 12:13 a.m.
  • 42 for White
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 1:14 a.m.
  • 65R-31P-41T-62D-42 and variants
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 3:07 a.m.
    • 65R-31P-41T-62D-42 and variants
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 4:12 p.m.
      • 65R-31P-41T-62D-61
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 10:18 p.m.
    • 65R-31P-41T-62D-42 and variants
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 5:08 p.m.
      • 65R-31P-41T-62D-42 and variants
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 1:16 a.m.
        • 65R-31P-41T-62D-42 and variants
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 1:24 a.m.
  • 42 for White
    Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 6:10 a.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 1:01 a.m.
  • More analysis requested *nm* *NM*
    rew -- Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 9:20 p.m.
    • More analysis requested *nm*
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 9:47 p.m.