BGonline.org Forums

Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 6:42 a.m.

In Response To: Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52? (Stick)

That was the reason why I determined I'd play 24/22 now, because at some point you are going to split against the stacks in any case. If 13/11 would offer the opportunity to make this split with a much better forward position as protection I'd play 13/11, but I don't see that, so 13/11 would be more of a postponement play and a building play.

Not an easy decision.

Messages In This Thread

• Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
  Stick -- Monday, 13 December 2010, at 2:48 a.m.
  • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
    neilkaz -- Monday, 13 December 2010, at 3:39 a.m.
    • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 13 December 2010, at 5:47 a.m.
      • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
        Stick -- Monday, 13 December 2010, at 5:47 a.m.
  • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 13 December 2010, at 11:32 p.m.
    • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
      Stick -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 3:25 a.m.
      • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
        Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 6:42 a.m.
      • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 8:22 a.m.
      • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 9:19 a.m.
  • Too simple - 54S-11N-32@-52?
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 6:46 a.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Tuesday, 14 December 2010, at 8:17 a.m.