| |
BGonline.org Forums
Comment for Tim and Nack (and Also for Anyone Else)
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Comment for Tim and Nack (and Also for Anyone Else) (Paul Weaver)
Date: Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 5:39 p.m.
I will presently e-mail you the copy of the three-page document that was PDF'ed into what you see on Tim's web site (the nack.pdf page). However, the second page of that doc is only an MS-Word table (not Excel). Btw, that chart is based solely (or almost solely) on rollout results posted on Stick's site (and as of Sept 2009, though that is probably the same as current).
About a year ago, Bill Calton combined my second page (table) and third page (Nactation explanation) into an Excel doc. Since then, I've done further work on it. The result is an Excel table with solid yellow fill across the top and bottom rows and solid orange fill down the far left and right columns, and a condensed two-column explanation of the Nactation (so that little or no scrolling is needed to see it). I'll e-mail this Excel doc as well; feel free to further improve the formatting and share.
I am working on another version that will be an all-bot aggregate (one letter per box, with tied plays listed below the table, and rows and columns reordered by point/run/split/down/slot type); I plan to publish it in the Nactation tutorial update in a couple/few months.
I will also create a table(s) for AtS (i.e., DMP, GS and GG) once I've accumulated enough XG data. But that will be a while. In the meantime, you could put together an AtS table from the GnuBG data alone, though much of the data is missing, shorthanded or corrupt, so whatever you create will be incomplete and only semi-reliable. That said, some plays are so clear that evals or existing Snowie non-AtS-checker-play results are sufficient to confidently occupy a large percentage of the boxes.
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.