[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

More analysis requested *nm*

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Wednesday, 15 December 2010, at 9:47 p.m.

In Response To: More analysis requested *nm* *NM* (rew)

Thematically

(1) with 1 back vs. 2 back, you're more vulnerable to both blitz and prime, and running is a more appealing plan than mutual holding or mutual priming. And hitting, sending a 3rd checker back, does gain either 18 or 11 pips in the running game, depending on whether or not Opp hits back.

(2) re mutual priming, 8/4 6/4 makes a 3rd priming point, but Opp is well ahead in that strategy, since he already has 3 and 1/2 priming points. And of course the hit reduces Opp's priming game, too, by sending the slotted checker to the bar.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.