BGonline.org Forums

oups! Nactation suggestion for aggregate result

Posted By: Claude Landry
Date: Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 6:34 p.m.

In Response To: 53P-54 and 64P-54 *NM* (Claude Landry)

Shouldn't we post aggregate result with an 'a' after bracket to not confuse with results with forgotten number of trials? Although when it posted by Nack we know its aggregate but from someone else we might not know!

So it could be like this, 53P-54 [S D8]a 64P-54 [D S29]a

Messages In This Thread

• 53P 54 ^46
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 5:02 a.m.
  • 53P-54 and 64P-54
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 6:23 a.m.
    • 53P-54 and 64P-54 *NM*
      Claude Landry -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 6:29 p.m.
      • oups! Nactation suggestion for aggregate result
        Claude Landry -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 6:34 p.m.
        • Good idea
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 10:51 p.m.
    • 53P-54 and 64P-54
      higonefive -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 6:29 p.m.
      • 53P-54 and 64P-54
        David Rockwell -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 7:08 p.m.
        • 53P-54 and 64P-54
          higonefive -- Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 10:54 p.m.