| |
BGonline.org Forums
Good idea
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: oups! Nactation suggestion for aggregate result (Claude Landry)
Date: Saturday, 18 December 2010, at 10:51 p.m.
Thanks, Claude, I like your idea. I already use "e" (or ev) for eval, and "t" or (tr) for trunc. I'll use "a" (or ag) for aggregate from now on. (If I forget, you can assume aggregate, but I'll try to remember.)
I'll use the single-letter abbreviations unless/until there is a reason to add the second letter.
Omitting the "m" (for money) before the brackets is still the standard, though including it is optional (and occasionally preferred in context).
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.