BGonline.org Forums

21S-41K-54>-44 trio, bot content

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 1:28 a.m.

In Response To: 21S-41K-54>-44 trio, bot content (Timothy Chow)

Great info as always, Nack. Even without your posts, I suspected that jiggering the position a bit might change the answer, and that strategical generalities (race lead, existence of return shots) wouldn't tell the whole story.

Right. The stronger one gets, the more one realizes that espoused principles are only guidelines. They usually don't provide pat answers, as some posts here might lead one to believe. Along those lines, I hope people take the time to read and understand (or at least appreciate) your variant-position posts, especially the recent ones.

It would be interesting to see if an XG rollout of 21S-41K-52>-44 agrees with "mt".

Yes! :)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 21S-41K-53-44
  John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 4:55 p.m.
  • 21S-41K-53-44
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 6:50 p.m.
  • 21S-41K-53-44
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Sunday, 19 December 2010, at 11:41 p.m.
    • 21S-41K-53>-44 trio
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 20 December 2010, at 3:26 a.m.
      • 21S-41K-53>-44 trio
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Monday, 20 December 2010, at 4:39 a.m.
      • 21S-41K-54>-44 trio, bot content
        Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 12:58 a.m.
        • 21S-41K-54>-44 trio, bot content
          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 1:05 a.m.
          • 21S-41K-54>-44 trio, bot content
            Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 21 December 2010, at 1:28 a.m.
  • 21S-41K-53-44
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Monday, 20 December 2010, at 9:13 a.m.
  • 21S-41K-53-44
    neilkaz -- Monday, 20 December 2010, at 5:04 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Monday, 20 December 2010, at 5:28 p.m.