BGonline.org Forums

54S-43^31 RO

Posted By: jdcartwright
Date: Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 4:37 p.m.

In Response To: 54S-43^31 RO (Claude Landry)

Nothing against RO's but can someone explain to me, without using a RO, why the hit and split play that I would make almost automatically is wrong.

Still a novice after all these years, Dennis

Messages In This Thread

• 54S-43^31 RO
  Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 3:13 a.m.
  • next 64R-43 *NM*
    Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 3:14 a.m.
    • Already taken
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 4:21 a.m.
      • Already taken
        mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 7:00 a.m.
        • RO at 3k, should I continue? *NM*
          Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 1:12 p.m.
          • RO at 3k, should I continue?
            mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 1:30 p.m.
  • 54S-43, 54S-41, 43S-43, 43S-41
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 5:44 a.m.
  • 54S-43^31 RO
    jdcartwright -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 4:37 p.m.
    • 54S-43^31 RO
      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 5:06 p.m.
    • H vs X, simple guideline
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 1:51 a.m.
      • H vs X, simple guideline
        rew -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 11:17 a.m.