BGonline.org Forums

H vs X, simple guideline

Posted By: rew
Date: Friday, 24 December 2010, at 11:17 a.m.

In Response To: H vs X, simple guideline (Nack Ballard)

Thanks Nack, I think I speak for many that we would like to see more of these insights which will help us get up to speed on opening theory.

jdcartwright : I recommend Sticks article on opening game found at gammonvillage. This should help plug som leaks you may have including this one. http://www.gammonvillage.com/backgammon/magazine/article_display.cfm?resourceid=6257

Messages In This Thread

• 54S-43^31 RO
  Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 3:13 a.m.
  • next 64R-43 *NM*
    Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 3:14 a.m.
    • Already taken
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 4:21 a.m.
      • Already taken
        mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 7:00 a.m.
        • RO at 3k, should I continue? *NM*
          Claude Landry -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 1:12 p.m.
          • RO at 3k, should I continue?
            mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 1:30 p.m.
  • 54S-43, 54S-41, 43S-43, 43S-41
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 5:44 a.m.
  • 54S-43^31 RO
    jdcartwright -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 4:37 p.m.
    • 54S-43^31 RO
      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 23 December 2010, at 5:06 p.m.
    • H vs X, simple guideline
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 1:51 a.m.
      • H vs X, simple guideline
        rew -- Friday, 24 December 2010, at 11:17 a.m.