BGonline.org Forums

E-Cigs Revisited

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 8:01 p.m.

In Response To: E-Cigs Revisited (Bill Riles)

Bill Riles wrote:

I can't believe there is no associated odor/aroma.

Is the existence of an odor crucial to your opposition? That is, suppose that there is in fact no aroma; are you still opposed?

Messages In This Thread

• E-Cigs Revisited
  Bill Riles -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 7:59 p.m.
  • E-Cigs Revisited
    Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 8:01 p.m.
  • E-Cigs Revisited
    Rich Munitz -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 8:48 p.m.
    • E-Cigs Revisited
      Leonardo Jerkovic -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 9:00 p.m.
      • E-Cigs Revisited
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 9:14 p.m.
      • E-Cigs Revisited
        roadkillbooks -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 6:29 a.m.
  • E-Cigs Revisited +1 *NM*
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 8:51 p.m.
  • E-Cigs Revisited
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 8:54 p.m.