| |
BGonline.org Forums
hypothetical #2
Posted By: phil simborg In Response To: hypothetical #2 (carter mattig)
Date: Saturday, 1 January 2011, at 9:35 p.m.
The more I ready your hypothetical questions the more I confuse it with hypocritical questions.
From a strictly hypothetical point of view, what would you say to a trouble-making backgammon player from Chicago who keeps asking questions that are not hypothetical at all, but are strictly designed to rile people up ("rile"--pun intended)?
I do owe you an apology. I always thought you tried to raise people's blood pressure in a chouette so they would make bad, emotional decisions, but now I see that it has nothing at all to do with the chouette at all!
So why don't you just say you are talking about Matt and Stick's lousy approach to picking up women? When you denigrate their looks and charms, it's obvious who you were talking about. Why make people guess?
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.