| |
BGonline.org Forums
Jacoby should be ON
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 43U-64 ^20 RO (mtuhtan)
Date: Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 8:48 p.m.
Hello Miran,
Sorry, I failed to notice, perhaps because your results have seemed more or less in line with what I expected. Thanks to Petter for bringing this matter to our attention.
Beavers shouldn't make a difference (though most people have them on as a matter of course), but Jacoby should be turned ON so that it is consistent with other people's rollouts (as far as I know, lol). For second roll positions, it seems to have made a difference of a couple of thousandths in the margin, though having seen very few non-Jacoby rollouts rerolled (which might not have even been the same seed) on XG, I've had little opportunity to compare. The only ones I can find offhand are a reroll of 21$-54 by Chase here and here (equities of .176 vs .175 and .136 vs .137, for S R40 vs S R38, after 10k), and a reroll of 64P-52 by NeilK here (equities of .108 vs .111, and .113 vs .113, for S D5 vs S D3, after 23k. There may have been one or two others.
I have now marked all your rollouts up to this point "non-Jacoby." That's 64R-32, 64S-32, 63R-51, 62S-53, 52D-54, 43U-64, and the pending 43U-53; let me know if you think of any others. (I'll also mark any third roll rollouts you have done prior to 2011, when I find them).
No worries, the data has still been worthwhile, but for optimal contribution, please turn Jacoby ON starting with the rollout after your current one (43U-53).
Thanks, and Happy New Year.
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.