BGonline.org Forums

Jacoby should be ON

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 3 January 2011, at 1:32 a.m.

In Response To: Jacoby should be ON (Nack Ballard)

Nack, in case you missed it, Philip Cherrington posted some interesting information here about the differences between Jacoby on and off. These are 7-ply evaluations and not rollouts, but it's still interesting IMO.

Messages In This Thread

• 43U-64 ^20 RO
  mtuhtan -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 2:20 p.m.
  • 43U-53 started *NM*
    mtuhtan -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 2:56 p.m.
    • Noted, Thx *NM*
      Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 8:54 p.m.
  • 43U-64 ^20 RO
    Petter Bengtsson -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 3:15 p.m.
    • 43U-64 ^20 RO
      mtuhtan -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 6:08 p.m.
      • Jacoby should be ON
        Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 8:48 p.m.
        • Jacoby should be ON
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 3 January 2011, at 1:32 a.m.
          • Jacoby should be ON
            Nack Ballard -- Monday, 3 January 2011, at 2:40 a.m.
  • 43U-64, data
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 2 January 2011, at 9:22 p.m.