[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Testing the limits of nactation

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 5 January 2011, at 1:37 a.m.

In Response To: Testing the limits of nactation (Matt Ryder)

In case it wasn't clear, I have no problem with nactation in general and think it's a great invention. The statement I made that started this subthread was that I gave up on trying to track all the rules that Nack continues to reveal in piecemeal fashion, because they seemed too ad hoc and unsystematic. In the course of this discussion, Nack has admitted that he hasn't publicized all the rules yet, so I'll back off from my complaints about the full system until it is released. At the same time I still see scant motivation for studying each little ad hoc rule as it appears, unless I see some evidence that the full system is both comprehensive and comprehensible.

I posted my example with 637 legal moves because Nack specifically said I should feel free to come up with a realistic position with a non-triple-whopper move that seemed to defy nactation. Also I wanted to illustrate what I meant by a systematic method. In order to nactate 637 or 1637 plays, one really needs to be extremely careful and precise about what the rules are. If one builds the system by handling new issues one at a time as they arise, then the risk of a contradictory or incomplete set of rules is quite high. At minimum, the full set of rules will be very complicated and difficult for anyone to master. Anyone who has worked on a large software project that has been revised over and over again and is swarming with bugs knows what I'm talking about.

None of this is meant to detract from the value of nactation for the opening. It's just to sound a warning about problems that are likely to materialize as the system becomes more and more ambitious, if it is not carefully planned in advance.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.