| |
BGonline.org Forums
THEN see this RO
Posted By: Daniel Murphy In Response To: THEN see this RO (Chuck Bower)
Date: Sunday, 9 January 2011, at 4:12 p.m.
Thanks, Chuck. I did look first at the Simborg position, and didn't believe the rollout that said Double/Pass. I would not have doubled, although I would not have been able to say how close to the D/T line it was. Stick's comment that people tend to double backgames too because people take them too late is spot on -- so, when I look at the Simborg position, a big part of my practical cube thinking is "I and nearly everyone I know is going to be taking this for a long time."
Then looking at the Bower position, I didn't believe that having the 4 point instead of the 5 point could make such a huge difference. And then I saw that Petter Bengtsson has apparently found the problem with the Simborg rollout. So there's some XG numbers to quantify "believe" -- 0.120 difference? Maybe. 0.360 difference No way. I did note that the 95% confidence intervals in both Chuck and Petter's rollouts are about 0.040
The Position of the Day rollouts ought to show their parameters.
At the POTD page, I thought this comment by "admin" was interesting, although I don't agree with it: "Whenever you disagree with or don’t believe the rollout from XG, there are basically two things you can do: 1) more rollouts and 2) play the game out many, many times yourself until you have some statistical proof that the bot is wrong."
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.