| |
BGonline.org Forums
Why use Nactation?
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: Why use Nactation? (leobueno)
Date: Sunday, 16 January 2011, at 5:48 p.m.
I am not a fan of Nactation for describing all moves throughout a game as I agree that the conventional notation is just generally clearer to all and because there are so many choices of moves that require all sorts of strange, difficult to remember symbols to differentiate one play from the other. That said, there will still be times where one of the many plays being considered mid-game is "bring down two checkers from the midpoint" and being able to say "D" is just easy and clear.
However, for the opening moves, Nactation is an excellent system. Within the first few rolls, the types of plays are rather standard: slot, split, reverse split, builders down, hit and down, hit and split. Nactation (once you've learned the few basic symbols) gives a nice way to describe the numerous openings with the more intuitive, conceptual, and descriptive "split" instead of the less intuitive, though no doubt more familiar "13/11 24/23".
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.