| |
BGonline.org Forums
Why use Nactation?
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Why use Nactation? (leobueno)
Date: Sunday, 16 January 2011, at 5:50 p.m.
No offense taken, Leobueno. Your questions are fair.
I'll let others respond to most of your post (if they wish), but I'd just like to clarify a couple of issues.
If Nactation is used correctly, there is no ambiguity. I don't think we would concede that traditional notation is ambiguous because (1) someone hasn't learned the point numbers, or (2) someone mistypes 13/9 8/1* and we don't know whether he means 13/9 8/3* or 13/9 6/1*.
I admit that some moves in Nactation (the ones people tend to ask about) require a sophisticated level of learning, but it's a small percentage of the ones that actually arise (I've seen entire games that require only the simpler letters), and for those moves you can either (a) get by with the use of assumption -- see Section 6 of the tutorial, or (b) fall back on traditional notation (or a hybrid) for those few moves.
If you choose to use or interpret Nactation for the early game (the phase for which it is primarily intended), you mostly just need to know the five basic characters (D, P, R, $, S) in Section 1.
Nack
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.