BGonline.org Forums

63 for White

Posted By: Lucas Bauer
Date: Friday, 28 January 2011, at 1:37 a.m.

In Response To: 63 for White (John O'Hagan)

I think I would play 9/3 8/5. We would have bad 62,65,66 next roll. Slotting now seems wrong because he holds the cube. Any one is good for him 11 is best, but 12 12 14 all cover the 5 and 15 and 16 escape a back man. Not to mention that slotting doesnt guarantee a cover next roll, after being reduced to a 5 prime.

Messages In This Thread

• 63 for White
  John O'Hagan -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 12:45 a.m.
  • 63 for White
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 12:58 a.m.
    • 63 for White
      Michael Petch -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 3:10 a.m.
  • 63 for White
    Lucas Bauer -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 1:37 a.m.
    • 63 for White
      Lucas Bauer -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 1:39 a.m.
  • 63 for White
    Golden -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 3:07 a.m.
  • 63 for White
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 9:27 a.m.
  • 63 for White
    garyo -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 12:56 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    Sebastiaan Kuijs -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 1:33 p.m.
    • 63 for White
      Sebastiaan Kuijs -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 1:34 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    ah_clem -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 2:17 p.m.
    • 63 for White
      Timothy Chow -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 3:18 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 4:01 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    ForestFriend -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 4:33 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    higonefive -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 5:28 p.m.
  • 63 for White
    Keene -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 9:36 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Friday, 28 January 2011, at 11:44 p.m.