BGonline.org Forums

53 To Play

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 31 January 2011, at 2:54 a.m.

In Response To: 53 To Play (W Womack)

I can't see breaking anchor here with equal boards and a slight race deficit. So I really see only two candidates: 13/5 and 13/10 13/8. 13/5 seems to contain White's rear checker better by providing both outfield coverage and another attacker within direct-shot range. It leaves 2 extra shots, but since we have a high anchor and White has a home-board blot, that's not much of a penalty to pay.

Messages In This Thread

• 53 To Play
  W Womack -- Sunday, 30 January 2011, at 7:22 p.m.
  • 53 To Play
    Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 30 January 2011, at 7:26 p.m.
  • 53 To Play
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 2:54 a.m.
  • 53 To Play
    Marty Storer -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 2:58 p.m.
    • 53 To Play
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 4:52 p.m.
  • 53 To Play
    ah_clem -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 4:33 p.m.