David: Based on recent exchanges with Nack, I like:
- 61P-55O-33A-55O-42D-d
Your first 55O is fine. It's not intrinsically better or worse, but I tend to prefer P for descriptive reasons. (The dedication clause excludes any other double 5s candidate from the P family.)
The second 55O should be underlined, if the intended play (as I assume) is the 3:1 ratio play 13/8(3) 8/3. If the play was 13/3(2), which I doubt because it leaves a blot on the midpoint, then O would be correct.
David: 55O (Outer 13-8(2) then 8-3(2)) works whether the 3 point is already made or not. I'm not used to this yet, but expect it will work well through time.
Right. There has to be some way to nactate 13/3(2) after the 3pt is slotted or made.
Assuming that I correctly construed Bill's intended sequence, Stick appears to have omitted Opp's final roll of 65 (forced play), and you followed suit.
Putting that together, I would write (or catalogue) the sequence thusly:
61P-55P-33A-55O-42D-65J-d
However, Bill also mentioned that the cube was turned. If I want to include that information, I'd alter the end of the sequence as shown on one of the two lines below (along with the -2-2 or -2-p score, whichever it happens to be):
61P-55P-33A-55O-42D-65J at –2–2[C]
61P-55P-33A-55O-42D-65J at –2–p[C]
If I want to convey when the cube turn occurred, then I'd write:
61P-55P-C-T-33A-55O-42D-65J at –2–2
, or
61P-55P-C-T-33A-55O-42D-65J at –2–p
Nack
| 61P-55P-33A-55O-42D-65J-d | |
|---|---|
| |
