BGonline.org Forums

52S-32S-22N-51S-C at 𣛨

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 8:44 a.m.

In Response To: 52S-32S-22N-51S-C at 𣛨 (Dmitriy Obukhov)

64R-52D-42S-22M-51S-C at 𣛨

Thank you for nactating this, but can you come up with another short sequince? 52S hurts my eyes ATS.

The other good same-length alternative is...

52D-32S-22M-51S-C at 𣛨

In that case you get rid of the opening 52S error (about -.015), but in exchange you get the 52D-32S error. They're probably around the same size, but both are smallish; take your pick.

If you are willing to trade brevity for elimination of even the .015(-ish) error, you can add a roll, obtaining the sequence (captioned in the diagram above) of

64R-52D-42S-22M-51S-C at 𣛨

In all cases, you can arguably forgive White for her 51S play (Bar/24 13/8), which is irrelevant if both sides subsequently execute proper cube action (C/P). If Blue fails to double or White (mis-) takes, then 51h (alt hit, Bar/24 6/1*) looks better.

Another possibility is 32S-52H-F-22G-51S-C at 𣛨, but it is the same length as the 64R sequence and it appears that Blue missed a proper cube turn after the fan.

[Key for double 2s plays: N = Near (24/22(2) 13/11(2)), M = Mayfair split (24/22 13/11 6/4(2), and G = Gremlin split (24/22 13/11(2) 6/4).]

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Cube action at -3-2
  Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 7:13 a.m.
  • Cube action at -3-2
    Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 7:16 a.m.
  • Cube action at -3-2
    ah_clem -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 3:04 p.m.
    • Cube action at -3-2
      Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 4:02 p.m.
    • Cube action at -3-2
      Stanley E. Richards -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 5:03 p.m.
  • Cube action at -3-2
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 3 February 2011, at 6:07 p.m.
  • Nactate please. Cube action at -3-2 *RO*
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 6:48 a.m.
    • 52S-32S-22N-51S-C at 𣛨
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 7:49 a.m.
      • 51S, not 51D?
        Stein Kulseth -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 8:13 a.m.
        • 51S, not 51D?
          Nack Ballard -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 8:29 a.m.
      • 52S-32S-22N-51S-C at 𣛨
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 7:46 a.m.
        • 52S-32S-22N-51S-C at 𣛨
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 8:44 a.m.
    • Nactate please. Cube action at -3-2 *RO*
      Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 7:51 a.m.
      • The match for cube action at -3-2 *RO*
        neilkaz -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 5:24 p.m.
        • Oops ment to say"math" *NM*
          neilkaz -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 5:25 p.m.
          • Oops ment to say"math"
            Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 8:41 p.m.
            • Oops ment to say"math"
              neilkaz -- Saturday, 5 February 2011, at 6:39 a.m.
  • Cube action at -3-2
    Nack Ballard -- Friday, 4 February 2011, at 8:13 a.m.