BGonline.org Forums

41-s ^46 RO .... etc etc

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 7:30 p.m.

In Response To: 41-s ^46 RO .... etc etc (neilkaz)

Thanks for the report, Neil.

For reference, I'm generally more interested in reconciling or defining disparate data. I have no expectation whatsoever that $ is best at 41-s. Stopping because XG reports it is 100% that $ is not best doesn't interest me.

What I do hope is that (when you get around to it) you'll give the 41-s rollout enough trials so that we can get a feel for whether XG2 3-ply's margin seems to agree with that of XG1 4-ply or with that of the widely differing GnuBG.

Thanks,

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 41-s ^46 RO
  Claude Landry -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 1:21 p.m.
  • 41-s ^46 RO
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 8 February 2011, at 10:56 p.m.
    • 41-s ^46*5 RO
      Claude Landry -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 1:26 p.m.
      • What's next?
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 7:19 p.m.
        • What's next? 54-s then 62-s *NM*
          Claude Landry -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 8:30 p.m.
          • Noted, Thx *NM*
            Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 11:47 p.m.
    • 41-s ^46 RO .... etc etc
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 4:29 p.m.
      • 41-s ^46 RO .... etc etc
        Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 7:30 p.m.
        • OK 41-s started
          neilkaz -- Wednesday, 9 February 2011, at 11:59 p.m.
          • OK 41-s started
            Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 10 February 2011, at 12:10 a.m.
    • Updated data for 41-s
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 10 February 2011, at 4:39 p.m.
      • Updated data for 41-s
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 10 February 2011, at 5:41 p.m.
  • 41-s ..here's my XG2 3 ply result
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 10 February 2011, at 1:11 p.m.