BGonline.org Forums

My Old 41 RO

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:53 p.m.

In Response To: 41 opening at $/UL with XG2? (Stick)

I'll extend this XG1 RO to 46k at some point soon, but this is a big difference between S and $. At least at this very high level of play, $ seems to lose a few too many G's BG's, IMHO.

	is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 167 Unlimited Game JacobyBeaver pip: 167 score: 0 is Player 1
XGID=-b----E-C---eE---c-e----B-:0:0:1:41:0:0:3:0:10
to play 41

1.	Rollout1	24/23 13/9	eq: +0.004
	Player: Opponent: 50.08% (G:14.32% B:0.71%) 49.92% (G:13.69% B:0.69%) Conf.: ± 0.004 (+0.000...+0.008) - [100.0%] Duration: 4 days 09 hours 56 minutes
2.	Rollout1	13/9 6/5	eq: -0.018 (-0.022)
	Player: Opponent: 49.85% (G:14.07% B:0.74%) 50.15% (G:14.68% B:1.08%) Conf.: ± 0.004 (-0.022...-0.014) - [0.0%] Duration: 5 days 06 hours 32 minutes
1 25920 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves and cube decisions: 4-ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21

Messages In This Thread

• 41-g RO
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 5:56 p.m.
  • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
    Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:20 p.m.
    • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
      Stick -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:25 p.m.
      • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:37 p.m.
        • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
          Stick -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:40 p.m.
          • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
            neilkaz -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:54 p.m.
        • 41 opening at $/UL with XG2?
          David Rockwell -- Sunday, 13 February 2011, at 3:49 a.m.
      • My Old 41 RO
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 6:53 p.m.
        • Opening 41, data for m, d, s and g
          Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 7:35 p.m.
  • Data for 41-g
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 12 February 2011, at 7:09 p.m.