BGonline.org Forums
52D-63S-C and 52D-63S-55A-F-C at –3–p
Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 7:44 p.m.
In Response To: 52D-63S-C and 52D-63S-55A-F-C at –3–p (Nack Ballard)
"I think it is a small-equity error not to double after 52D-63S"
If playing an error rate match it is probably correct to not cube. The small error is probably worth getting an extra (or more than one) potential cube turn in denominator.
Messages In This Thread
- Post Crawford cube decisions
Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 3:30 p.m.
- Post Crawford cube decisions
Casper van der Tak -- Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 4:01 p.m.
- Post Crawford cube decisions
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 4:23 p.m.
- Post Crawford cube decisions
Lucas Bauer -- Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 4:29 p.m.
- Post Crawford cube decisions
christian munk-christensen -- Wednesday, 16 February 2011, at 5:16 p.m.
- Post Crawford cube decisions -- Rollout
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 17 February 2011, at 5:38 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.