BGonline.org Forums

Here's mine/Technical questions

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Monday, 28 February 2011, at 6:31 p.m.

In Response To: Here's mine/Technical questions (higonefive)

In XG2, XGR's cube is almost as strong as 4 ply cube. But using XGR cube doesn't slow down a 3 ply RO by a huge ammount. Especially at a score like this, I feel better with a higher cube setting, just to try to reduce cube errors that might give up lots of equity. I could upgrade further and use XGR+ cube, but that would make this RO really slow.

The CI is too low to claim clear statistical significance, but this is all the computer time I have to devote to this play.

Messages In This Thread

• 41S-54 2a12a RO
  higonefive -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 7:21 a.m.
  • 41S-54 at 𣇻2
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 9:03 a.m.
    • 41S-54 at 𣇻2, interim result
      higonefive -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 11:08 a.m.
  • Here's mine
    neilkaz -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 4:21 p.m.
    • Here's mine/Technical questions
      higonefive -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 6:14 p.m.
      • Here's mine/Technical questions
        neilkaz -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 6:31 p.m.
        • Thanks. I will proceed the classic 3ply (current X S D) *NM*
          higonefive -- Monday, 28 February 2011, at 7:38 p.m.